By John Willinsky
During this textual content, John Willinsky makes use of glossy social concerns and ancient precedents to illustrate that the social sciences can and may give a contribution way more to public wisdom than they've got long ago. we've got the applied sciences, Willinksy demonstrates, and want merely the choice to create a public source out of social learn which can expand democratic participation and self-determination, in addition to enhance research's concentration and public aid. The ebook bargains examples of why and the way this isn't merely attainable yet useful, within the face of knowledge-based economies and a withering public region.
Read or Download If Only We Knew: Increasing The Public Value of Social Science Research PDF
Best social work books
Crew houses are the dominant type of residential lodging for individuals with critical studying or highbrow disabilities, and but there are major difficulties inside those dwelling environments. This booklet seeks to focus on the foremost concerns for either citizens and employees, and provides functional feedback for making improvements to group dwelling.
The second one variation of this article makes a speciality of tips on how to plan, perform, study, and evaluation interventions on the micro, meso, and macro degrees. A sociological practitioner enters right into a operating dating with consumers to handle social difficulties. The practitioner works with individuals of a consumer approach to outline the explicit alterations precious and jointly they paintings to build new social preparations that would resolve or decrease the influence of the matter.
During the last 40 years, the sector of incapacity experiences has emerged from the political activism of disabled humans. during this tough overview of the sphere, major incapacity educational and activist Tom Shakespeare argues that incapacity learn wishes a less attackable conceptual and empirical footing.
This new version is up-to-date all through, reflecting Shakespeare’s newest pondering, drawing on present examine, and responding to controversies surrounding the 1st version and the realm record on incapacity, in addition to incorporating new chapters on cultural incapacity reviews, own information, sexuality, and violence. utilizing a serious realist method, incapacity Rights and Wrongs Revisited promotes a pluralist, engaged and nuanced method of incapacity. Key themes mentioned include:
dichotomies – going past risky polarizations reminiscent of clinical version as opposed to social version to accomplish a posh, multi-factorial account of disability
identity - the drawbacks of the incapacity movement's emphasis on id politics
bioethics - offerings at first and finish of lifestyles and within the box of genetic and stem mobilephone therapies
relationships – feminist and advantage ethics ways to questions of intimacy, tips and friendship.
This stimulating and obtainable publication demanding situations incapacity reviews orthodoxy, selling a brand new conceptualization of incapacity and clean examine schedule. it truly is a useful source for researchers and scholars in incapacity stories and sociology, in addition to execs, coverage makers and activists.
- Rethinking Prostitution: Purchasing Sex in the 1990s
- Treating Young Veterans: Promoting Resilience Through Practice and Advocacy
- Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Pocket Guides to Social Work Research Methods)
- Communication and Interpersonal Skills in Social Work (Transforming Social Work)
Additional info for If Only We Knew: Increasing The Public Value of Social Science Research
If this provides some sense of what is “public” about the public knowledge of concern to the social sciences, the reader may still ask, What then makes it “knowledge”? To say that something is “public knowledge” is to point to its widespread acceptance as fact. Public knowledge, in this sense, is wrapped up in traditional notions of the true and the real. What makes it knowledge, rather than information, is a judgment call that has to do with, perhaps, how well what is known fits within a greater understanding of some phenomenon.
The “knowledge management services” industry is growing into a multi-billion-dollar enterprise. The SAS Institute of Cary, North Carolina (“Turning Data into Pay Dirt”), invests $200 million annually in research and development on decision-support software. Financial analysts who conduct research on companies’ stock prospects earn salaries of $350,000 to $10 million, and a know-corp like Hoover’s, which serves up mostly free information on 14,000 companies to some 2 2. 3. Fritz Machlup, Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962); Drucker’s statistic is based on census figures for “professional, managerial, and technical people”: Peter Drucker, The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society (New York: Harper & Row, 1968), 264; Daniel Bell, The Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting (New York: Basic Books, 1973), 44; Thomas Sowell, Knowledge and Decisions (New York: Basic Books, 1980), 48.
Researchers may imagine themselves to be working on permanent, lasting contributions to knowledge, and a few may well be doing so, but such aspirations need to be integrated with current responsibilities to advancing public knowledge, where their work is most likely to do some lasting good. The knowledge lives not as it accumulates, in some sort of continuous streaming forward, but only as it is reworked, rethought, and reinterpreted. Malinowski took what now seems to be a very small step on the question of race, but such points of analysis are part of how progress in public and academic knowledge is measured.
If Only We Knew: Increasing The Public Value of Social Science Research by John Willinsky